Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio

Artículos

Vol. 1 Núm. 1 (2001): julio-diciembre, 2001

Proposition 187 and Operation Gatekeeper: Cases for the Sociology of International Migrations and Human Rights

DOI
https://doi.org/10.17428/rmi.v1i1.1293
Publicado
2017-06-30

Resumen

Este artículo examina la vulnerabilidad de los inmigrantes como sujetos de derechos humanos. Esta condición de ausencia de poder es analizada en la relación que los inmigrantes establecen con la sociedad receptora en el marco de dos ejercicios de soberanía. Por una parte, la noción clásica de los derechos soberanos que hacen distinciones sociolegales entre nacionales e inmigrantes/extranjeros. Por otra, la noción moderna de soberanía de algunos Estados que se adhieren a los estándares internacionales de losderechos humanos. El artículo se enfoca en el debate acerca de la Proposición 187 y la implementación de la Operación Guardián en la experiencia de inmigrantes mexicanos en los Estados Unidos. En su conclusión, el autor postula que la globalización de la economía conlleva el surgimiento de estándares internacionales, incluidos los de los derechos humanos. Este proceso conduce a la desaparición gradual de la condición de vulnerabilidad de los inmigrantes y a su integración en condiciones de igualdad con los nacionales respecto al Estado y la ley, incluyendo el derecho al voto en elecciones locales.ABSTRACTThis article examines the vulnerability of immigrants as subjects of human rights. This condition of powerlessness is analyzed in a framework of two exercises of sovereignty within the relationships that immigrants establish with the receiving society. On one hand is the classic notion of sovereign rights, which draws socio-legal distinctions between nationals and immigrants/foreigners. On the other hand is a modern notion of sovereignty accepted by certain States that adhere to international human rightsstandards. The article focuses on the debate about Proposition 187 and the implementation of Operation Gatekeeper in the experience of Mexican immigrants in the United States. In his conclusion, the author postulates that economic globalization brings about the emergence of international standards, including those for human rights. This process leads to the gradual disappearance of immigrants' condition of vulnerability and their integration, under equal status with nationals, in respect to the State and the law, including the right to vote in local elections.

Imagen de portada

Palabras clave

  • migración internacional
  • derechos humanos
  • soberanía
  • México
  • Estados Unidos

Cómo citar

Bustamante, J. A. (2017). Proposition 187 and Operation Gatekeeper: Cases for the Sociology of International Migrations and Human Rights. Migraciones Internacionales, 1(1), 7–34. https://doi.org/10.17428/rmi.v1i1.1293

Citas

  1. Almaguer, Tomás, Racial Fault Lines: The Historical Origins of White Supremacy in California, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1994.
  2. Bartelson, Jens, A Genealogy of Sovereignty, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995.
  3. Becker, Howard S., Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance, New York, The Free Press, 1966.
  4. Bendix, Reinhard, Kings or People: Power and the Mandate to Rule, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1978.
  5. Bourdieu, Pierre, Méditations Pascaliennes, Paris, Editions du Seuil, 1997.
  6. Bustamante, Jorge A., “Undocumented Immigrations: Research Findings and Policy Options”, in Riordan Roett (ed.), Mexico and the United States: Managing the Relation, Boulder (Colorado), Westview Press, 1988.
  7. ———, “Measuring the Flow of Undocumented Immigrants”, in W. Cornelius and J. A. Bustamante (eds.), Mexico to the United States: Origins, Consequences and Policy Options, La Jolla (California), Center for U.S.- Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego, 1989.
  8. ———, “Undocumented Migration to the United States: Preliminary Findings of the Zapata Canyon Project”, in Frank Bean et al. (eds.), Undocumented Migration to the United States, three volumes, Mexico City, Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores; Washington, D. C., U.S. Commission on Immigrations Reform, 1998.
  9. Feagin, Joe R., Hernán Vera, and Pinar Batur, White Racism, 2d ed., New York, Routledge, 2001.
  10. Feagin, Joe R., and Clairece Booher Feagin, Racial and Ethnic Relations, Upper Saddle River (New Jersey), Prentice-Hall, 1999.
  11. General Accounting Office (GAO), Illegal Immigration: Status of Southwest Border Strategy Implementation, Washington, D. C., GAO, 1999.
  12. Giddens, Anthony, The Consequences of Modernity, Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1990.
  13. Goodwin-Gill, Jenny, and Richard Perruchoud, “Basic Humanitarian Principles Applicable to Non-Nationals”, in International Migration Review 19, 1988, pp. 556-58.
  14. Haas, Michael, Institutional Racism: The Case of Hawaii, Westport (Connecticut), Praeger Publishers, 1992.
  15. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1997 Statistical Yearbook of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, Washington, D. C., U.S. Government Printing Office, 1998.
  16. Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, American Civil Liberties Union of San Diego & Imperial Counties and California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation v. United States of America (pending case, filed May 9, 2001).
  17. International Organization for Migration (IOM), “IOM and Effective Respect for Migrant Rights”, presented at the Round Table on Effective Respect for the Rights and Dignity of Migrants, New Needs and Responses, February, 1996.
  18. Los Angeles Times, July 19, 2000, and May 24, 2001.
  19. Mailman, Stanley, “California’s Proposition 187 and its Lessons”, in New York Law Journal, January 3, 1995, 3.
  20. Miles, Robert, Racism after “Race Relations”, London, Routledge, 1993. Robinson, Mary, Human Rights, No. 1 (Winter) 1997/1998. Romo, Ricardo, East Los Angeles: History of a Barrio, Austin, University of Texas Press, 1983.
  21. Saavedra, Pablo, “Protección Consular a la Luz de la Jurisprudencia del Sistema Inter Americano de Protección a los Derechos Humanos”, paper presented at the “Workshop on Best Practices Related to Migrant Workers”, organized by the IOM and CEPAL in Santiago, Chile, June 19-20, 2000.
  22. San Diego Union-Tribune, various issues. Smith, Claudia, “Border Safety Is Doublespeak”, http://stopgate keeper.org/ english/index.html, July 3, 2001.
  23. U.S. Department of Labor, Migrant Farmworkers: Pursuing Security in an Unstable Labor Market, Research Report No. 5, Washington, D.C., 1994.
  24. U.S.-Mexico Migration Panel, Mexico-U.S. Migration: A Shared Responsibility, Washington, D. C., Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and the Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México, 2001.
  25. U.S. News & World Report, September 23, 1996.
  26. Waters, Malcolm, Globalization, London, Routledge, 1995.

Artículos similares

También puede {advancedSearchLink} para este artículo.