Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Papers

Vol. 6 No. 24 (2013): January-June, 2013

That’s how Life is over there, Isn’t it? Family Life Changes among Mexican Non-Migrants who Stayed behind

DOI
https://doi.org/10.17428/rmi.v6i24.708
Published
2017-04-03

Abstract

Th is article studies the experiences of the non-migrating kin of Mexican undocumented emigrants to the United States. It examines the negotiations and changes in family life of those who stayed behind by looking at spouses’, siblings’ and parent-children’s relations. First, it analyzes the perceptions and imaginaries that non-migrants hold of migrants’ life abroad and introduces three possible outcomes for its conceptualization: positive overcompensation, neutral perspective and negative compensation.It also analyzes the positive changes in family dynamics for the individual self-perceptions of those who stay behind. Subsequently, it discusses the role played by the extended family in the household arrangements following emigration. Lastly, it explores the relations and adjustments taking place between return-migrants and those who stayed behind.Así es la vida allá, ¿no?: Cambios en la vida familiarde mexicanos no migrantesResumenEn este trabajo se estudian las experiencias de los familiares no migrantes de mexicanos indocumentados en Estados Unidos. Considerando las relaciones de cónyuges, hermanos, padres e hijos, se pretende lograr una mejor comprensión de los cambios y negociaciones en la vida familiar de los que se quedan. En primer lugar, se analizan las percepciones e imaginarios de los no migrantes sobre la vida de sus migrantes en el extranjero y se sugieren tres conceptualizaciones al respecto: sobrecompensación positiva, perspectiva neutra y compensación negativa.Posteriormente se estudia el rol que la familia extensa y política juega en los arreglos intrafamiliares. Por último, se discuten las relaciones y reajustes que tienen lugar entre los migrantes de retorno y los que se quedan.

Cover image

Keywords

  • Mexico-United States migration
  • transnational family relations
  • compensation
  • non-migrants staying behind
  • extended family

How to Cite

Echegoyén Nava, G. (2017). That’s how Life is over there, Isn’t it? Family Life Changes among Mexican Non-Migrants who Stayed behind. Migraciones Internacionales, 6(24), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.17428/rmi.v6i24.708

References

  1. ARIAS, Patricia, and Ofelia WOO MORALES, 2004, “La migración
  2. urbana hacia Estados Unidos. Tres ejemplos de la zona
  3. metropolitana de Guadalajara”, Papeles de Población, Universidad
  4. Autónoma del Estado de México, vol. 10, no. 42, October-
  5. December, pp. 36-72.
  6. AYSA, María, and Douglas MASSEY, 2004, “Wives Left Behind:
  7. The Labor Market Behavior of Women in Migrant Communities”, in Jorge Durand, and Douglas Massey, eds., Crossing the
  8. Border: Research from the Mexican Migration Project, New York,
  9. Russell Sage Foundation.
  10. D’AUBETERRE BUZNEGO, María Eugenia [paper], 2001,
  11. “¿To dos estamos bien? Género y parentesco en familias de trans -
  12. migrantes poblanos”, in “2001 Meeting of the Latin American
  13. Studies Association”, Washington, D.C., El Colegio de Michoacán/
  14. Be nemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, September
  15. -8.
  16. DREBY, Joanna, 2009, “Negotiating Work and Parenting over the
  17. Life Course: Mexican Family Dynamics in a Binational Context”,
  18. in Nancy Foner, ed., Across Generations: Immigrant Families
  19. in America, New York/London, New York University Press.
  20. DURAND, Jorge, and Douglas MASSEY, 2003, Clandestinos.
  21. Migra ción México-Estados Unidos en los albores del siglo XXI, Uni -
  22. versidad Autónoma de Zacatecas/Miguel Ángel Porrúa.
  23. FALICOV, Celia, 2003, “Immigrant Family Processes”, in Froma
  24. Walsh, ed., Normal Family Processes: Growing Complexity and
  25. Diversity, 3rd ed., New York/London, Guildford Press.
  26. FALICOV, Celia, 2005a, “Ambiguous Loss: Risk and Resilience
  27. in La tino Immigrant Families”, in Marcelo Suárez-Orozco,
  28. Carola Suárez-Orozco, and Desiree Qin-Hilliard, eds., The
  29. New Immigration: An Interdisciplinary Reader, New York,
  30. Routledge.
  31. FALICOV, Celia, 2005b, “Emotional Transnationalism and Family
  32. Identities”, Family Process, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 399-406.
  33. FLORES, Nadia; Rubén HERNÁNDEZ-LEÓN, and Douglas
  34. MASSEY, 2004, “Social Capital and Emigration from Rural
  35. and Urban Communities”, in Jorge Durand, and Douglas
  36. Massey, eds., Crossing the Border: Research from the Mexican
  37. Migration Project, New York, Russell Sage Foundation.
  38. FONER, Nancy, 1999, “The Immigrant Family: Cultural Legacies
  39. and Cultural Changes”, in Charles Hirschman, Philip
  40. Kasi nitz, and Josh DeWind, eds., The Handbook of International
  41. Migration: The American Experience, New York, Russell
  42. Sage Foundation.
  43. FONER, Nancy, 2009, Across Generations. Immigrant Families in
  44. America, New York/London, New York University Press.
  45. FRESNEDA SIERRA, Javier, 2001, “Redefinición de las relaciones
  46. fami liares en el proceso migratorio ecuatoriano a España”,
  47. Migraciones Internacionales 1, vol. 1, no. 1, July-December, pp.
  48. -144.
  49. FUSSELL, Elizabeth, and Douglas MASSEY, 2004, “The Limits
  50. to Cumulative Causation: International Migration from Mexican
  51. Urban Areas”, Demography, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 151-171.
  52. GMELCH, George, 1980, “Return Migration”, Annual Review of
  53. Anthropology, no. 9, pp. 135-159.
  54. GONZÁLEZ CALVO, Valentín, 2005, “El duelo migratorio”,
  55. Trabajo Social. Revista del Departamento de Trabajo Social, Facultad
  56. de Ciencias Humanas-Universidad Nacional de Colombia,
  57. no. 7, pp. 77-97.
  58. HERNÁNDEZ-LEÓN, Rubén, 2008, Metropolitan Migrants:
  59. The Migration of Urban Mexicans to the United States, Berkeley,
  60. University of California Press.
  61. HONDAGNEU-SOTELO, Pierrete, 1994, Gendered Transitions:
  62. Mexican Experiences of Immigration, Berkeley, University of
  63. California Press.
  64. KOTHARI, Uma, 2003, “Introduction: Migration, Staying Put
  65. and Livelihoods”, Journal of International Development, vol. 15,
  66. no. 5, pp. 607-609.
  67. LEYVA, René, and Marta CABALLERO, 2009, Las que se quedan:
  68. Contextos de vulnerabilidad a ITS y VIH/sida en mujeres compañeras
  69. de migrantes, Cuernavaca, Mexico, Instituto Nacional
  70. de Salud Pública.
  71. LÓPEZ MONTAÑO, Luz María, and María Olga LOAIZA
  72. OROZCO, 2009, “Padres o madres migrantes internacionales
  73. y su familia: Oportunidades y nuevos desafíos”, Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, Manizales,
  74. Colombia, Universidad de Manizales, vol. 7, no. 2, pp.
  75. -860.
  76. MANCILLAS BAZÁN, Celia, and Daniel RODRÍGUEZ RODRÍGUEZ,
  77. , “Muy cerca pero a la distancia: Transiciones
  78. familiares en una comunidad poblana de migrantes”, Migraciones
  79. Internacionales 16, vol. 5, no. 1, January-June, pp. 35-64.
  80. MARGOLIS, Maxine, 1994, Little Brazil. An Ethnography of Brazilian
  81. Immigrants in New York City, Princeton, United States,
  82. Princeton University Press.
  83. PEDONE, Claudia [unpublished paper], 2003, “Tú siempre jalas
  84. a los tuyos. Cadenas y redes migratorias de familias ecuato
  85. rianas hacia España”, Barcelona, Universitat Autònoma de
  86. Barcelona.
  87. PRIBILSKI, Jason, 2004, “Aprendemos a convivir: Conjugal Relations,
  88. Co-parenting, and Family Life among Ecuadorian
  89. Transnational Migrants in New York City and the Ecuadorian
  90. Andes”, Global Networks, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 313-334.
  91. REYES, Melanie, 2008, “Migration and Filipino Children Left
  92. Behind: A Literature Review”, unicef. Available at
  93. www.unicef.org/philippines/Synthesis_StudyJuly12008.pdf>
  94. (last ac cessed on April 25, 2012).
  95. RUIZ SÁNCHEZ, Joel, 2008, “La familia política: Notas para
  96. una discusión”, Revista Sociológica, vol. 23, no. 66, pp. 175-186.
  97. Available at <http://www.revistasociologica.com.mx/pdf/6608.
  98. pdf> (last accessed on April 25, 2012).
  99. RUMBAUT, Rubén, 2005, “Children of Immigrants and their
  100. Achievement: The Role of Family, Acculturation, Social Class,
  101. Gender, Ethnicity, and School Contexts”, Seminar Papers, University
  102. of Harvard. Available at <http://www.hks.harvard.edu/
  103. inequality/Seminar/Papers/Rumbaut2.pdf> (last accessed on
  104. April 25, 2012).
  105. SUÁREZ-OROZCO, Carola; Irina TODOROVA, and Josephine
  106. LOUIE, 2002, “Making up for the Lost Time: The Experience
  107. of Separation and Reunification among Immigrant
  108. Families”, Family Process, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 625-643.
  109. VERTOVEC, Steven, 2009, Transnationalism. Key Ideas, London/
  110. New York, Routledge.