Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Migraciones Internacionales e-ISSN: 2594-0279

Papers

Vol. 13 (2022): January-December, 2022

Between Technology and Distances: Emotional Remittances and Bonding Culture in Ecuadorian Transnational Families

DOI
https://doi.org/10.33679/rmi.v1i1.2560
Published
2022-09-15

Abstract

Analyses of economic remittances have focused on the role of migrants as providers. This study broadens the concept of locating remittances at the emotional level as a key factor in the reciprocal and conflictive relationships built between migrants and non-migrants. Through qualitative thematic analysis, the association between physical distance and virtual co-presence is explored in the experiences and perceptions of three groups of Ecuadorians: migrants, migrants’ relatives, and returned migrants. The findings suggest that, thanks to ICTs, the co-responsibility for keeping the culture of bonds active means that, while it is strengthened by feelings of love and solidarity, it also reveals tensions over resentments, obligations, and guilt. Although virtual co-presence that exists is dynamic and daily, emotional gaps persist. This illustrates the need for programs that support transnational families to cope with the effects of separation.

Keywords

  • migration
  • ICT
  • co-presence
  • Ecuador.
  • Spain

How to Cite

Chalá Mejía, P., Suquillo Guijarro, X., & Villafuerte, I. (2022). Between Technology and Distances: Emotional Remittances and Bonding Culture in Ecuadorian Transnational Families. Migraciones Internacionales, 13. https://doi.org/10.33679/rmi.v1i1.2560

Copyright (c) 2022 Migraciones Internacionales

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Arroyo, A. J. y Corvera, I. (2003). Actividad económica, migración a Estados Unidos y remesas en el occidente de México. Migraciones Internacionales, 2 (1), 36-58.
  2. Asis, M. (2002). From the life stories of Filipino women: Personal and family agendas in migration. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 11(1), 67-94. https://doi.org/10.1177/011719680201100104
  3. Atkinson, R. y Flint, J. (2001). Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: Snowball research strategies. Social Research Update, (33), 1-4.
  4. Bacigalupe, G. y Cámara, M. (2012). Transnational families and social technologies: Reassessing immigration psychology. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38 (9), 1425-1438. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2012.698211
  5. Baldassar, L. (2008). Missing kin and longing to be together: Emotions and the construction of co-presence in Transnational Relationships. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 29 (3), 247-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256860802169196
  6. Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001
  7. Benítez, J. L. (2012). Salvadoran transnational families: ICT and communication practices in the network society. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38 (9), 1439-1449. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2012.698214
  8. Bertoli, S. y Marchetta, F. (2014). Migration, remittances and poverty in Ecuador. Journal of Development Studies, 50 (8), 1067-1089. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2014.919382
  9. Boccagni, P. y Baldassar, L. (2015). Emotions on the move: Mapping the emergent field of emotion and migration. Emotion, Space and Society, 16, 73-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2015.06.009
  10. Braun, V. y Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77-101.
  11. Bryceson, D. y Vuorela, U. (2002). The transnational family: new European frontiers and global networks. Nueva York/Oxford: Berg Publishers.
  12. Calero, C., Bedi, A. y Sparrow, R. (2009). Remittances, liquidity constraints and human capital Investments in Ecuador. World Development, 37 (6), 1143-1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.10.006
  13. Canales, A. y Montiel Armas, I. (2004). Remesas e inversión productiva en comunidades de alta migración a Estados Unidos. El caso de Teocaltiche, Jalisco. Migraciones Internacionales, 2 (3), 142-172.
  14. Carling, J. (2014). Scripting remittances: Making sense of money transfers in transnational relationships. International Migration Review, 48 (1), 218-262. https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12143
  15. Carrillo Espinosa, M. C. (2010). Imágenes que viajan: El rol de la fotografía en la migración ecuatoriana. Revista Chilena de Antropología Visual, (15), 81-102.
  16. Cohen, L., Manion, L. y Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6a ed.). Nueva York: Routledge.
  17. Comas d’Argemir, D. y Pujadas Muñoz, J. (1991). Familias migrantes: Reproducción de la identidad y del sentimiento de pertenencia. Papers. Revista de Sociología, 36, 33-56. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers/v36n0.1586
  18. Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research meaning and perspective in the research process. Londres: Sage Publications.
  19. Diminescu, D. (2008). The connected migrant: An epistemological manifesto. Social Science Information, 47 (4), 565-579. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018408096447
  20. Flores, J. (2005). The diaspora strikes back reflections on cultural remittances. NACLA Report on the Americas, 39 (3), 21-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714839.2005.11725320
  21. Folbre, N. (2001). The invisible heart: Economics and family values. Nueva York: The New Press.
  22. Fondo Monetario Internacional. (2009). Transacciones Internacionales de Remesas. Guía para compiladores y usuarios. Recuperado de https://www.imf.org/external/spanish/np/sta/bop/2009/rcg/pdf/guides.pdf
  23. Francisco, V. (2015). “The Internet is magic”: Technology, intimacy and transnational families. Critical Sociology, 41 (1), 173-190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513484602
  24. Frowe, I. (2001). Language and educational practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 31 (1), 89-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640125441
  25. Garbin, D. (2019). Sacred remittances: Money, migration and the moral economy of development in a transnational African church. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45 (11), 2045-2061. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1433528
  26. Gonzálvez Torralbo, H. (2016). Las familias transnacionales ¿una tautología? Más allá de la dicotomía “distancia/proximidad geográfica”. Polis (Santiago), 15 (43), 511-532. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-65682016000100024
  27. Gowricharn, R. (2004). Moral capital in Surinamese transnationalism. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 27 (4), 607-621. https://doi.org/10.1080/01491987042000216735
  28. Guarnizo, L. E. (2003). The economics of transnational living. International Migration Review, 37 (3), 666-699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2003.tb00154.x
  29. Hochschild, A. (2008). La mercantilización de la vida íntima. Apuntes de la casa y el trabajo (Trad. L. Mosconi). Madrid: Katz Editores.
  30. Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. y Avila, E. (1997). “I’m here, but I’m there”: The meanings of Latina transnational motherhood. Gender & Society, 11 (5), 548-571.
  31. Huennekes, J. (2018). Emotional remittances in the transnational lives of Rohingya families living in Malaysia. Journal of Refugee Studies, 31 (3), 353-370. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fey036
  32. Ibáñez, J. (1985). Análisis sociológico de textos o discursos. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 43 (1), 119-160.
  33. Ivlevs, A. (2015). Happy Moves? Assessing the link between life satisfaction and emigration intentions. Kyklos, 68 (3), 335-356. https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12086
  34. Katigbak, E. (2015). Moralizing emotional remittances: Transnational familyhood and translocal moral economy in the Philippines’ “Little Italy”. Global Networks, 15 (4), 519-535. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12092
  35. Komito, L. (2011). Social media and migration: Virtual community 2.0. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62 (6), 1075-1086. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21517
  36. Krawatzek, F. y Müller-Funk, L. (2020). Two centuries of flows between ‘here’ and ‘there’: political remittances and their transformative potential. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46 (6), 1003-1024. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1554282
  37. Leifsen, E. y Tymczuk, A. (2012). Care at a distance: Ukrainian and Ecuadorian transnational parenthood from Spain. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38 (2), 219-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2012.646419
  38. Levitt, P. (1998). Social remittances: Migration driven local-level forms of cultural diffusion. International Migration Review, 32 (4), 926-948. https://doi.org/10.1177/019791839803200404
  39. López Fernández, R. (2020). El potencial de las emociones en el estudio de los movimientos migratorios. Un análisis sobre poder y estatus a partir de historias de vida de mujeres migrantes empleadas de hogar. Migraciones. Revista del Instituto Universitario de Estudios sobre Migraciones, (49), 5-29. https://doi.org/10.14422/mig.i49.y2020.001
  40. Lynch, K. y McLaughlin, E. (1995). Caring labour and love labour. En P. Clancy, S. Drudy, K. Lynch y L. O’Dowd (Eds.), Irish society: Sociological perspectives (pp. 250-292). Dublín: Institute of Public Administration.
  41. Madianou, M. (2012). Migration and the accentuated ambivalence of motherhood: The role of ICTs in Filipino transnational families. Global Networks, 12 (3), 277-295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2012.00352.x
  42. Madianou, M. y Miller, D. (2011). Mobile phone parenting: Reconfiguring relationships between filipina migrant mothers and their left-behind children. New Media and Society, 13 (3), 457-470. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810393903
  43. Martinez, C., Cummings, M. y Vaaler, P. (2015). Economic informality and the venture funding impact of migrant remittances to developing countries. Journal of Business Venturing, 30 (4), 526-545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.10.004
  44. Mata-Codesal, D. (2016). Are all dollars equal? The meanings behind migrants’ financial transfers. Migraciones Internacionales, 8 (28), 39-64. https://doi.org/10.17428/rmi.v8i1.587
  45. Mazzucato, V. (2011). Reverse remittances in the migration– development nexus: Two-way flows between Ghana and the Netherlands. Population, Space and Place, 17 (5), 454-468. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.646
  46. McKay, D. (2007). “Sending dollars shows feeling”: Emotions and economies in Filipino migration. Mobilities, 2 (2), 175-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450100701381532
  47. Nedelcu, M. (2017). Transnational grandparenting in the digital age: mediated co-presence and childcare in the case of Romanian migrants in Switzerland and Canada. European Journal of Ageing, 14, 375-383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-017-0436-1
  48. Nedelcu, M. y Wyss, M. (2016). “Doing family” through ICT-mediated ordinary co-presence: Transnational communication practices of Romanian migrants in Switzerland. Global Networks, 16 (2), 202-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12110
  49. Parella, S. (2007). Los vínculos afectivos y de cuidado en las familias transnacionales: Migrantes ecuatorianos y peruanos en España. Migraciones Internacionales, 4 (2), 151-188.
  50. Parella Rubio, S., y Cavalcanti, L. (2006). Una aproximación cualitativa a las remesas de los inmigrantes peruanos y ecuatorianos en España y a su impacto en los hogares transnacionales. Reis, (116), 241-258.
  51. Peñaranda Cólera, M. (2010). “Te escuchas aquí al lado”: Usos de las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación en contextos migratorios transnacionales. Athenea Digital, (19), 239-248.
  52. Portes, A. y DeWind, J. (2004). A cross-Atlantic dialogue: The progress of research and theory in the study of international migration. International Migration Review, 38 (3), 828-851. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00221.x
  53. Pribilsky, J. (2004). “Aprendemos a convivir”: Conjugal relations, co-parenting, and family life among Ecuadorian transnational migrants in New York City and the Ecuadorian Andes. Global Networks, 4 (3), 313-334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2004.00096.x
  54. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Nueva York: Simon & Schuster.
  55. Real Academia Española. (2021). Remesa. Diccionario de la lengua española. Recuperado de https://dle.rae.es/remesa
  56. Richman, K. y Rey, T. (2009). Congregating by cassette: Recording and participation in transnational Haitian religious rituals. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 12 (2), 149-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877908099497
  57. Robinson, O. (2014). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11 (1), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2013.801543
  58. Sayad, A. (2010). La doble ausencia. De las ilusiones del emigrado a los padecimientos del inmigrado. Barcelona: Anthropos.
  59. Schmalzbauer, L. (2004). Searching for wages and mothering from afar: The case of Honduran transnational families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66 (5), 1317-1331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00095.x
  60. Simoni, V. y Voirol, J. (2021). Remittances and morality: family obligations, development, and the ethical demands of migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47 (11), 2516-2536. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1779678
  61. Sun, K. (2016). Professional remittances: how ageing returnees seek to contribute to the homeland. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42 (14), 2413-2429. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2016.1179106
  62. Tabar, P. (2014). “Political remittances”: The case of Lebanese expatriates voting in national elections. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 35 (4), 442-460. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2014.913015
  63. Tapia Ladino, M. y Gonzálvez Torralbo, H. (2013). “Me voy a España a trabajar”: Familias migrantes colombianas, remesas económicas y relaciones de género en un contexto transnacional. Chungará (Arica), 45 (2), 333-347. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-73562013000200009
  64. Thomas, W. y Znaniecki, F. (1996). The Polish peasant in Europe and America: A classic work in immigration history. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  65. Vasco, C. (2013). Migration, remittances and entrepreneurship: The case of rural Ecuador. Migraciones Internacionales, 7 (1), 37-64. https://doi.org/10.17428/rmi.v7i1.685
  66. Wilding, R. (2006). “Virtual” intimacies? Families communicating across transnational contexts. Global Networks, 6 (2), 125-142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2006.00137.x
  67. Zontini, E. (2006). Italian families and social capital: Care provision in a transnational world. Community, Work and Family, 9 (3), 325-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668800600743636