Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Migraciones Internacionales e-ISSN: 2594-0279

Papers

Vol. 2 No. 6 (2004): January-June, 2004

Migration Strategies in Urban Contexts: Labor Migration from Mexico City to the United States

DOI
https://doi.org/10.17428/rmi.v2i6.1261
Published
2017-06-30

Abstract

The progressive urbanization of Mexican society is a process strongly associated with the increasing participation of the urban-origin population in the migratory flow to the United States. The “urbanization” of this international labor flow has changed the profile of Mexican migration to the United States. This article examines the social dynamics of international migration in urban contexts, particularly in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area. Based on a migration systems perspective, the article explores the way that international migration operates in Mexico City and the different migration strategies pursued by migrants from this city. The article analyses demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of individuals in the Mexico City survey (conducted by the author) as well as their patterns of internal and international migration, and the general characteristics of their U.S. migration experience. Finally, it presents some biographical sketches to illustrate the various patterns of migration from Mexico City.RESUMENLa acelerada urbanización de la sociedad mexicana es un proceso fuertemente asociado a la creciente participación de población de origen urbano en el flujo migratorio hacia Estados Unidos. Esta “urbanización” del flujo laboral internacional ha promovido cambios en el perfil de la migración mexicana hacia Estados Unidos. El presente artículo examina la dinámica social de la migración internacional en contextos urbanos, particularmente en la zona metropolitana de la ciudad de México (ZMCM). Con base en la perspectiva de los sistemas migratorios, el artículo explora la forma en que opera la migración internacional en dicha ciudad y las diferentes estrategias migratorias adoptadas por los migrantes de ella. Se analizan las características socioeconómicas y demográficas de los individuos incluidos en la encuesta de la ciudad de México (levantada por el autor), sus patrones de migración interna e internacional y las características generales de su experiencia migratoria a Estados Unidos. Finalmente, se presentan algunos resúmenes biográficos que ilustran distintos patrones migratorios desde la ciudad de México.

Cover image

Keywords

  • international migration
  • migration patterns
  • urban migration
  • Mexico City
  • United States

How to Cite

Lozano Ascencio, F. (2017). Migration Strategies in Urban Contexts: Labor Migration from Mexico City to the United States. Migraciones Internacionales, 2(6), 34–59. https://doi.org/10.17428/rmi.v2i6.1261
Copyright Notice

References

  1. Alba, Francisco, “El patrón migratorio entre México y Estados Unidos: su relación con el mercado laboral y el flujo de remesas”, in M. García y Griego and G. Vega (eds.), México-Estados Unidos 1984, El Colegio de México, 1985, pp. 201-220.
  3. ———, “Aspectos urbanos de la migración laboral: La situación en los países de origen”, Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos, 9(3), 1994, pp. 629-656.
  5. Bean, Frank D., T. Espenshade, M. White, and R. Dymowski, “Post-IRCA Changes in the Volume and Composition of Undocumented Migration to the United States: An Assessment Based on Apprehensions Data”, in F. Bean, B. Edmonston, and J. Passel (eds.), Undocumented Migration to the United States: IRCA and the Experience of the 1980s, Washington (D. C.), The Urban Institute Press, 1990, pp. 111-158.
  7. Consejo Nacional de Población (Conapo), “Encuesta en la Frontera Norte a Trabajadores Indocumentados Devueltos por las Autoridads de los Estados Unidos de América. Diciembre de 1984 (ETIDEU). Resultados Estadísticos”, Mexico, D.F., 1986.
  9. Cornelius, Wayne, Labor Migration to the United States: Development Outcomes and Alternatives in Mexican Sending Communities, Final Report to the Commission for the Study of International Migration and Cooperative Development, The Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies/ University of California, San Diego, 1990.
  11. ———, “From Sojourners to Settlers: The Changing Profile of Mexican Immigration to the United States”, in J. Bustamante, C. Reynolds and R. Hinojosa (eds.), U.S.-Mexico Relations: Labor Market Interdependence, Stanford (CA), Stanford University Press, 1992.
  13. Corona Vázquez, Rodolfo, “Modificaciones de las características del flujo migratorio laboral de México a Estados Unidos”, in M. A. Castillo, A. Lattes and J. Santibáñez (eds.), Migración y fronteras, El Colef/ALAS/El Colmex, México, 1998.
  15. ———, Estimación del número de indocumentados a nivel estatal y municipal, Aportes de Investigación No. 8, Centro Regional de Investigaciones Multidisciplinarias, UNAM, México, 1987.
  17. Durand, Jorge, Más allá de la línea, Consejo Nacional para la Cultura y las Artes, México, 1994.
  19. Faist, Thomas, “Developing Transnational Social Spaces: The Turkish-German Example”, in Ludger Pries (ed.), Migration and Transnational Social Spaces, Ashgate, Aldershot England, 1999, pp. 36-72.
  21. Gamio, Manuel, Mexican Migration to the United States. A Study of Human Migration and Adjustment, Chicago (IL), University of Chicago Press, 1930.
  23. Glick Schiller, Nina, Linda Basch, and Christina Szanton-Blank, “From Immigrants to Transmigrants: Theorizing Transnational Migration”, in Ludger Pries (ed.), Migration and Transnational Social Spaces, Ashgate, Aldershot England, 1999, pp. 73-105.
  25. Granovetter, M. S., “The Strength of Weak Ties”, American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1973, pp. 134-155.
  27. Guarnizo, Luis E., “Los Dominicanyorks: The Making of a Binational Society”, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 533, 1993, pp. 70-86.
  29. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática (INEGI), ENADID. Encuesta Nacional de la Dinámica Demográfica: Metodología y tabulados, INEGI, Aguascalientes (México), 1994.
  31. ———, Conteo de Población y Vivienda 1995 (Estados Unidos Mexicanos, Resultados definitivos). Aguascalientes (México), INEGI, 1997.
  33. Kritz, Mary M., and Hania Zlotnik, “Global Interactions: Migration Systems, Processes, and Policies”, in Mary M. Kritz, Lin Lean Lim and Hania Zlotnik (eds.), International Migration Systems. A Global Approach, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1992, pp. 1-16.
  35. Legalized Population Survey (LPS), Legalized Population Survey Public Use Tape, matched 1989-1992 file, U.S. Department of Labor-Bureau of International Labor Affairs-Division of Immigration Policy and Research, Washington, D. C., 1996.
  37. Lomnitz, Larissa, “Migration and Networks in Latin America”, in A. Portes and H.L. Browning (eds.), Current Perspectives in Latin America Urban Research, University of Texas Press, Austin, 1976, pp. 133-150.
  39. López Castro, Gustavo, La casa dividida: un estudio de caso sobre la migración a Estados Unidos en un pueblo michoacano, El Colegio de Michoacán, México, 1986.
  41. Lozano Ascencio, Fernando, “Continuidad y cambios en la migración temporal entre México y Estados Unidos”, in M. A. Castillo, A. Lattes and J. Santibáñez (eds.), Migración y fronteras, pp. 305-320, El Colef/ ALAS/El Colmex, México, 1998.
  43. ———, Bryan Roberts, and Frank D. Bean, “The Interconnectedness of Internal and International Migration: The Case of the United States and Mexico”, Soziale Welt, Sonderband 12, 1997, pp. 163-178.
  44. Marcelli, Enrico A., and Wayne A. Cornelius, “The Changing Profile of Mexican Migrants to the United States: New Evidence from California and Mexico”, Latin American Research Review, 36(3), 2001, pp. 105-131.
  46. Massey, Douglas S., Luin Goldring, and Jorge Durand, “Continuities in Transnational Migration: An Analysis of Nineteen Mexican Communities”, American Journal of Sociology, 99, 1994, pp. 1492-1533.
  48. Massey, Douglas S., Rafael Alarcón, Jorge Durand, and Humberto González, Return to Aztlan. The Social Process of International Migration from Western Mexico, University of California Press, 1987.
  50. Mines, Richard, Developing a Community Tradition of Migration: A Field Study in Rural Zacatecas: Mexico and California Settlement Areas, La Jolla (CA), Center for U.S.-Mexico Studies-University of California, San Diego (Monograph Series, No. 3), 1981.
  52. Papail, Jean, “Factores de la migración y redes migratorias”, in Mexican Ministry of Foreign Affairs and U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform, Migration Between Mexico and United States. Binational Study, vol. 3, 1998, pp. 975-1000.
  54. Pick, James B., and Edgar W. Butler, Mexico Megacity, Boulder, Westview Press, 1997.
  56. Portes, Alejandro, “Immigration Theory for a New Century: Some Problems and Opportunities”, International Migration Review, vol. 31, 1997, pp. 799-825.
  58. Roberts, Bryan R., R. Frank, and Fernando Lozano Ascencio, “Transnational Migrant Communities and Mexican Migration to the United States”, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22(2), 1999, pp. 238-266.
  60. Rouse, Roger, “Making Sense of Settlement: Class Transnationalism,Cultural Struggle and Transformation among Mexican Migrants in the United States”, in Nina Glick Schiller, L. Basch, and C. Blank-Szanton (eds.), Towards a Transnational Perspective on Migration: Race, Class, Ethnicity, and Nationalism Reconsidered (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 645), 1992, pp. 25-52.
  62. Smith, Robert C., “Los ausentes siempre presentes: The Imagining, Making, and Politics of a Transnational Community between Ticuani, Puebla, Mexico and New York City”, unpublished dissertation, Political Science, Columbia University, 1995.
  64. Wolcott, Harry F., The Art of Fieldwork, Walnut Creek (CA), Altamira Press, 1995.
  66. Fecha de recepción: 1 de marzo de 2004
  67. Fecha de aceptación: 28 de mayo de 2004