The Migration Experience as It Relates to Cargo Participation in San Miguel Cuevas, Oaxaca

Resumen

This article provides an overview of the ongoing effects of migration on municipal governance and community organization in the Mixtec town of San Miguel Cuevas in Oaxaca, Mexico. Legally constituted as a self governing indigenous municipality, Cuevas has recently been reconstituted as a transnational community whose citizens now reside mainly in Cuevas and Fresno, California. Increased circular and permanent migration to the United States since the late 1980s and the customary law (usos y costumbres) enforced in the community, situates its migrants in a complex array of familial and community obligations that require fulfilling civic and ceremonial obligations (cargos) in order - to maintain one’s citizenship and residence in Cuevas and to have access to its communally owned lands and other resources. La experiencia migratoria en relación con la participación en cargos en San Miguel Cuevas, OaxacaResumenEste artículo ofrece un recuento de los continuos efectos de la migración sobre el gobierno municipal y la organización de una comunidad mixteca: San Miguel Cuevas, Oaxaca, México. Legalmente constituida como un autogobierno municipal indígena, en décadas recientes, Cuevas ha sido reconstituida como una comunidad transnacional, cuyos ciudadanos radican principalmente en ella y en Fresno, California. La creciente circularidad y permanente migración de Cuevas a Estados Unidos desde finales de los ochenta, así como los usos y costumbres impuestos por la vida comunitaria en Cuevas, pone a sus varones migrantes en una situación complicada para cumplir sus obligaciones familiares y comunitarias –cívicas y ceremoniales (cargos)–, que se requieren para mantener su ciudadanía y residencia en Cuevas y tener acceso a tierras comunales y otros recursos.

Imagen de portada

Palabras clave

• migration
• Mixtec
• customary law
• cargo system
• San Miguel Cuevas
• Oaxaca

Cómo citar

Citas

1. Anaya Muñoz, Alejandro (2006), Autonomía indígena, gobernabilidad y legitimidad en México: La legalización de usos y costumbres electorales en Oaxaca, Mexico, D. F., Universidad Iberoamericana.
2. Anderson, Benedict (2006), Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, New York, NY, Verso. Besserer, Federico (1999), Moisés Cruz: Historia de un transmigrante, Culiacán, Sinaloa/México, D. F., Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa/Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Iztapalapa campus.
3. Cota-Cabrera, Bribrilia et al. (2009), “San Miguel Tlacotepec as a Community of Emigration,” in W. A. Cornelius et al. (eds.), Migration from the Mexican Mixteca: A Transnational Community in Oaxaca and California, San Diego, California, University of California San Diego/Center for Comparative Immigration Studies, pp. 1-29
4. Cohen, Jeffrey H. (2007), “Rural Responses to Political Unrest in Oaxaca City, Mexico: Preliminary Findings. Project muse,” Scholarly Journals Online, pp. 22-31.
5. Cordero Avendaño de Durand, Carmen (2001), La vara de mando: Costumbre jurídica en la transmisión de poderes, 2a. ed., Oaxaca City, Mexico, H. Ayuntamiento de Oaxaca de Juárez. Estrada Villanueva, Ariana (2003), Jóvenes y gobernabilidad en comunidades transnacionales, estudio de un caso: Ixpantepec Nieves, Oaxaca, Mexico, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Iztapalapa campus.
6. Foster, George M. (1979), Tzintzuntzán: Mexican Peasants in a Changing World, New York, Elsevier North Holland, Inc. Garduño, Everardo, Efraín García and Patricia Morán (1989), Mixtecos en Baja California: El caso de San Quintín, Mexicali, B. C., México, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California.
7. Gil Martínez de Escobar, Rocío (2006), Fronteras de pertenencia: Hacia la construcción del bienestar y el desarrollo comunitario transnacional de Santa María Tindú, Oaxaca, Coyoacán, D. F., Mexico, Casa Juan Pablos/Fundación Rockefeller/Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Iztapalapa campus/Departamento de Antropología.
8. Goldring, Luin (1999), “The Power of Status in Transnational Social Fields,” in M. P. Smith and L. E. Guarnizo (eds.), Transnationalism from Below, New Brunswick, New Jersey,
9. Transaction Publishers, pp. 165-195 (Comparative Urban and Community Research, vol. 6).
10. Hall, Stuart (1996), “Who Needs ‘Identity’?,” in S. Hall and P. du Gay (eds.), Questions of Cultural Identity, Thousand Oaks, California, sage Publications, pp. 1-17.
11. Hall, Stuart, and David Held (1989), “Citizens and Citizenship,” in S. Hall and J. Martin (eds.), New Times, London, Lawrence and Wishart, pp. 173-188.
12. Hernández-Díaz, Jorge (2007), “Dilemas en la construcción de ciudadanías diferenciadas en un espacio multicultural: El caso de Oaxaca,” in J. Hernández-Díaz (eds.), Ciudadanías diferenciadas en un estado multicultural: Los usos y costumbres en Oaxaca, México, Universidad Autónoma Benito Juárez de Oaxaca, pp. 35-86.
13. Kearney, Michael (1986), “Integration of the Mixteca and the Western U.S.-M exican Border Region Via Migratory Wage Labor,” in I. R . Urey (ed.), Regional Impacts of U.S.-Mexican Relations, San Diego, California, University of California San Diego/Center for U.S.-M exican Studies, pp. 71-102 (Monograph Series, 16).
14. Kearney, Michael (1996), Reconceptualizing the Peasantry: Anthropology in Global Perspective, Boulder, Colorado, Westview Press.
15. Kearney, Michael (2001), “Class and Identity: The Jujitsu of Domination and Resistance in OaxaCalifornia,” in D. Holland and J. Lave (eds.), History in Person: Enduring Struggles and Identities in Practice, Santa Fe, New Mexico, School of American Research Press, pp. 247-280.
16. Kearney, Michael (2003), “Valor, clase, y espacio en las comunidades mixtecas transnacionales,” Universidad de México, num. 620, pp. 5-11.
17. Kearney, Michael and Carole Nagengast (1989), Anthropological Perspectives on Transnational Communities in Rural California, Davis, California, California Institute for Rural Studies.
18. Kearney, Michael and Federico Besserer (2004), “Oaxacan Municipal Governance in Transnational Context,” in J. Fox and
19. G. Rivera-Salgado (eds.), Indigenous Mexican Migrants in the United States, La Jolla, California, University of California San Diego/Center for U.S.-M exican Studies/Center for Comparative Immigration Studies, pp. 449-466.
20. Levitt, Peggy (2001), The Transnational Villagers, Berkeley/Los Angeles, California, University of California Press.
21. López Bárcenas, Francisco (2004a), “Los sistemas indígenas de cargos en la Mixteca,” in A. Hernández Núñez and F. López Bárcenas (eds.), La fuerza de la costumbre: Sistema de cargos en la Mixteca oaxaqueña, México, Centro de Orientación y Asesoría a Pueblos Indígenas, pp. 9-28 (Derechos Indígenas, vol. 8).
22. López Bárcenas, Francisco (2004b), “Sistema de Cargos en Santa Rosa Caxtlahuaca,” in A. Hernández Núñez and F. López Bárcenas (eds.), La fuerza de la costumbre: Sistema de cargos en la Mixteca oaxaqueña, México, Centro de Orientación y Asesoría a Pueblos Indígenas, pp. 65-87 (Derechos Indígena, vol. 8).
23. López, Felipe H. and David Rusten (2004), “Mixtecs and Zapotecs Working in California: Rural and Urban Experiences,” in J. Fox and G. Rivera-Salgado (eds.), Indigenous Mexican Migrants in the United States, La Jolla, California, University of California San Diego/Center for U.S.-M exican Studies/Center for Comparative Immigration Studies, pp. 249-278.
24. Marshall, T. H. (1950), Citizenship and Social Class, Cambridge, United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press.
25. Martínez Novo, Carmen (2004), “ ‘We Are Against the Government, Although We Are the Government’: State Institutions and Indigenous Migrants in Baja California in the 1990s,” The Journal of Latin American Anthropology, vol. 9, num. 2, pp. 352-831.
26. Matus Ruiz, Maximino (2004), “Estrategias económicas informales como sustento de una comunidad transnacional: El caso de San Miguel Cueva, Oaxaca,” Bachelor degree, inah/Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia. Miles, Ann (2004), From Cuenca to Queens: An Anthropological Story of Transnational Migration, Austin, Texas, University of Texas Press.
27. Ong, Aihwa (1999), Flexible Citizenship: The Cultural Logics of Transnationality, Durham, North Carolina, Duke University Press.
28. Perry, Elizabeth et al. (2009), “Between Here and There: Ethnicity, Civic Participation, and Migration in San Miguel Tlacotepec,” in W. A. Cornelius et al. (eds.), Migration from the Mexican Mixteca: A Transnational Community in Oaxaca and California, San Diego, California, University of California San Diego/Center for Comparative Immigration Studies, pp. 207-235.
29. Ramírez, Reyna (2002), “Julia Sánchez’s Story: An Indigenous Woman between Nations,” Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, vol. 23, num. 2, pp. 65-83.
30. Ravicz, Robert S. (1965), Organización social de los mixtecos, Mexico, D. F., Instituto Nacional Indigenista.
31. Romney, Kimball and Romaine Romney (1966), The Mixtecans of Juxtlahuaca, Mexico (vii vols.), vol. iv, New York, Robert E. Krieger Publishing Co., Inc.
32. Rusten, David and Michael Kearney (1994), A Survey of Oaxacan Village Networks in California Agriculture, Davis, California, California Institute for Rural Studies.
33. Smith, Robert C. (2006), Mexican New York: Transnational Lives of New Immigrants, Berkeley, California, University of California Press.
34. Stephen, Lynn (1996), “The Creation and Re-creation of Ethnicity: Lessons from the Zapotec and Mixtec Oaxaca,” Latin American Perspectives, vol. 23, num. 2, pp. 17-37.
35. Stephen, Lynn (2007), Transborder Lives: Indigenous Oaxacans in Mexico, California and Oregon, Durham, North Carolina, Duke University Press.
36. Stuart, James, and Michael Kearney (1981), Causes and Effects of Agricultural Labor Migration from the Mixteca of Oaxaca to California, La Jolla, California, University of California San Diego/Program in U.S.-M exican Studies.
37. Szanton Blanc, Cristina, Linda Basch and Nina Glick Schiller (1995), “Transnationalism, Nation-State and Culture,” Current Anthropology, vol. 36, num. 4, pp. 683-686.
38. Turner, Bryan S. (1993), Citizenship and Social Theory, London/ Newbury Park, California, sage Publications.
39. Velasco Ortiz, M. Laura (2002), El regreso de la comunidad: Migración indígena y agentes étnicos: Los mixtecos en la frontera México-Estados Unidos, Tijuana, B. C., México, El Colegio de México/Centro de Estudios Sociológicos/El Colegio de la Frontera Norte.
40. Velasco Ortiz, M. Laura (2005), Desde que tengo memoria: Narrativa de identidades en indígenas migrantes, Tijuana, B. C., Mexico, El Colegio de la Frontera Norte/Fondo Nacional para la Cultura y las Artes.
41. Wence Partida, Nancy Elizabeth (2006), Una comunidad transnacional al extremo: Los límites y cambios en su gobernabilidad, Mexico, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Iztapalapa campus. Wolf, Eric R. (1955), “Types of Latin American Peasantry: A Preliminary Discussion,” American Anthropologist, vol. 57, pp. 452-471.
42. Wolf, Eric R. (1957), “Closed Corporate Peasant Communities in Mesoamerica and Central Java,” Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, vol. 13, pp. 1-18.
43. Interviews28
44. Bautista, Flavio; Gutiérrez, Jesús; Domínguez Santos, Rufino.
45. Date of receipt: August 18, 2008.
46. Date of acceptance: February 3, 2009.
47. All interviews were conducted by the author in Fresno, California, in 2007.